S. Ellen Macdonald, Anne C. S. McIntosh, Selena Schut, Samuel Bartels, Seung-Il Lee, Elvira Baisheva, Jeff Battigelli, Erin Bayne, Yves Bergeron, Mathieu Bouchard, Brendan Casey, Mats Dynesius, Tanya Handa, Joakim Hjalten, Kristoffer Hylander, Matti Koivula, Jari Kouki, Therese Löfroth, Asko Lõhmus, Anders Nielsen, Sonya Odsen, Manuela Panzacchi, Jaime Pinzon, Peter B. Reich, Pavel Shirokikh, Ekaterina Shorohova, Ilkka Vanha-Majamaa, Lisa Venier, Timothy Work, Linhao Wu. Biodiversity recovery is slow following clear-cut harvest of boreal forests 2026. Nat Sustain s41893-026-01868-x
DOI : 10.1038/s41893-026-01868-x
Boreal forests are important reservoirs of biodiversity, carbon and timber stocks. However, timber harvest can alter biodiversity in these forests without clear evidence on the duration needed for biotic groups to recover. Resilience of boreal forest biodiversity to clear-cut harvest was examined with a meta-analysis of 190 datasets from boreal and hemi-boreal forests of Europe/Russia and North America for arthropods, birds, small mammals, lichens, bryophytes and vascular plants. We modelled similarity of community composition between harvested and unharvested stands versus years post harvest. In approximately half of cases, predicted times for recovery to pre-harvest composition were ≤30 years. In other cases, recovery took much longer or had not occurred within the timeframe of our data; for example, in conifer forest: >100 years (bryophytes), >55 years (small mammals), ~95 years (lichens) and ~85 years (vascular plants). Saproxylic beetles showed no resilience within the 16 (conifer forest) or 29 (mixed forest) years post harvest for which we had data. Recovery generally took longer in conifer and mixed than in broadleaf forests, which always showed either resistance (bryophytes, vascular plants) or resilience with recovery within 12–25 years. Conserving biodiversity in boreal forests will require extended rotations, management for ‘old forest’ structural elements and areas protected from harvesting.
Martin Alcala Pajares, Annie DesRochers, Miguel Montoro Girona. Impacts of partial cuts on aboveground carbon stocks in esker forests 2026. For. Ecol. Manage. 123355
DOI : 10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123355
The impacts of partial cuts on carbon stocks remain uncertain due to elevated post-harvest windthrow mortality that may counteract the positive effects of thinning on stand growth. This study evaluated the effects of partial cuts and tree mortality on aboveground carbon stocks eight years after harvest in jack pine forests. The experimental design included 24 sites with varying harvest intensities: unharvested control, moderate (30–35 %), and heavy (40–50 %) thinnings. Dendrochronological analyses and allometric equations were used to quantify carbon in live and dead biomass (snags, broken, and uprooted trees). Increases in individual tree carbon stocks between the pre-harvest year and the eighth year post-harvest were lower in controls and similar among partial cut treatments. Eight years after harvest, live carbon stocks per hectare were 41 % lower in the heavy thinning than in unharvested stands but remained similar between moderate thinning and control treatments. Larger trees and those growing closer to skidding trails showed greater increases in carbon stock, with the latter exhibiting a 33 % higher increase on average. Mean total deadwood carbon stocks were 55 % higher in the control than in the partial cuts due to reduced snag carbon in harvested stands. Uprooting was influenced by harvest treatment and proximity to skidding trails, while stem breakage was driven by tree characteristics (height, age, and competition) and distance to trails. The proportion of snags was explained by mean annual wind speed. These findings suggest that moderate thinning could sustain forest carbon stocks with prescriptions aiming at maintaining snag carbon stocks.