Deadwood is a key component for biodiversity and ecosystem services in boreal forests; however, the abundance of this critical element is declining worldwide. In natural forests, deadwood is produced by tree death due to physical disturbances, senescence, or pathogens. Timber harvesting, fire suppression, and salvage logging reduce deadwood abundance and diversity, and climate change is expected to bring further modifications. Although the effects of these changes are not yet fully understood, restoring a continuous supply of deadwood in boreal forest ecosystems is vital to reverse the negative trends in species richness and distribution. Increasing the availability of deadwood offers a path to building resilient forest ecosystems for the future.

Living trees are fundamental for boreal forest biodiversity. They contribute to stand structural diversity, which determines the range of habitat niches available for forest-dwelling species. Specific characteristics of living trees, such as species, age, and presence of microhabitats, determine how species utilize trees for food, as nesting places, or as growing substrates. This chapter explores the associations between living trees and aboveground biodiversity, reviews the factors such as soil productivity, hydrological regime, stand successional stage, and forestry activities that influence the characteristics of living trees and stand structural diversity, and presents the consequences of current and future climate change on boreal biodiversity.

The boreal forest holds the world's largest soil carbon (C) reservoir. A large portion of it is contained in a thick organic layer originating from the slow decay of bryophytes. Because a thick organic layer slows down tree growth, reduces forest productivity, and thereby reduces the potential wood supply, silvicultural treatments that aim to maintain or restore forest productivity after harvesting often involve mechanical site preparation. However, while these treatments can increase growth and C storage in trees, they can also lead to accelerated decomposition of the soil organic matter, reducing C storage. In this study, we assessed the nine-years effect of two silvicultural treatments on soil C dynamics in forested peatlands of northwestern Quebec, compared to unharvested controls: (1) cut with protection of regeneration and soils (CPRS; low soil disturbance, also called careful logging around advanced growth (CLAAG)), (2) CPRS followed by mechanical site preparation (CPRS + MSP, plowing; severe soil disturbance). The mass loss rate of three bryophytes (Pleurozium schreberi, Sphagnum capillifolium, and Sphagnum fuscum) was measured over two growing seasons together with soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. We also studied the different effects of temperature, water table level, depth, and type of soil layer on mosses decomposition.We observed a significant influence of silvicultural treatments, bryophyte species, and soil layer type (fibric, mesic, humic and mineral) on bryophyte mass loss, which was higher in the CPRS + MSP treatment (21.6 ± 0.13 % standard error) than in control sites (9.5 ± 0.21 %); CPRS alone resulted in an intermediate mass loss of 11.6 ± 0.23 %, for Sphagnum mosses. Bryophyte mass loss was significantly higher in fibric than humic layer. SOC stocks in the uppermost organic soil layer (fibric) were lower in the CPRS + MSP group than in the control group, while the CPRS group was intermediate; however, differences were not statistically significant for the other soil layer and for total SOC. We conclude that while CPRS + MSP accelerates Sphagnum moss decomposition in the topsoil layer, it has limited impact on total soil C stocks that are detectable with stock change methods.

Sustainable forest management relies on a diversity of harvesting practices to conserve the variety of stand structures and compositions found in natural forests. Extensive use of clearcuts can homogenize stand structure by removing all the canopy, damage forest soils and destroy older downed woody debris already present within stands. In contrast partial cuts maintain some standing overstory and conserve certain biological legacies like large live trees as well as standing and downed dead wood, and thus should better conserve biodiversity. However, given the large number of species potentially affected by harvest operations, balancing harvesting intensity and conservation of biodiversity requires a clear understanding of habitat requirements of resident organisms and species conservation post-harvest. We examined the impacts of increasing intensities of stem removal (33%, 40%, 66% and 100%) 20 years after harvest on bryophyte communities in three stand types common in the succession sequences of Eastern boreal mixedwood forests that were dominated by trembling aspen, mixedwood and conifers. While many generalist and common forest species were shared among all harvesting levels and forest types, more specialized species like liverworts differed strongly between uncut and clearcut stands. However, liverworts and other specialists differed less between uncut and partial cut stands. Bryophyte species in hardwood dominated stands tolerated more fluctuations in environmental conditions than species in mixed stands. We were unable to find habitat specialists typically associated with coniferous stands and may be related to prior outbreaks of spruce budworm that occurred 30 years ago. Our results highlight how harvest intensity and forest stand type interact to affect bryophytes and how intact stands may be required to conserve many species that are sensitive to any degree of harvesting.